You again.
I really loved this series of photographs, until the 7th one which then leads onto the last. As much as I like the photo itself, the whole concept of love being existent in everything is slightly boring now. And the last image that shows a smile, rather than the previous frowns that scream lonliness, suggests that love greatly contributes to a persons happiness. And, although I can believe this to be true, I don't like that people feel useless and worthless without 'another half'', because even when there is someone you can connect with so beautifully, a balance is important, right? So why can't we appreciate the other aspects when love isn't included? Why do we just long to share much of our time with one person that we'll spend the little time we get with friends - genuine and constant companions - insulting? I just don't agree that love is always the source to happiness - there are other things that matter too, the people you were glued to before just the one. This is not at all directed to anyone, most people are ok at the moment, actually.
This, though...
No, it's cool. It's aimed to someone that'll never read this and that could never upset me. It's just something you said that shocked me a little. Although you probably don't take it so seriously, you have a role of high responsibility. Previously it had been handed to you on a plate a bit, so you may not understand all that needs to be arranged, but really - as amusing as it is for the first minute, it becomes cheek-reddening. That it's repeatedly become a problem suggests you should look into it, no? And I don't think you recognise the humiliation we'd have to live through with its immediate impact, before the shouting we'll have to endure.
....and not cool.
Although you may enjoy passing judgement on people so frequently and harshly, you may want to consider your own position first, so that 'retaliation' cannot be used as the way to describe to later actions... didn't think this one through, did you?
This, though...
No, it's cool. It's aimed to someone that'll never read this and that could never upset me. It's just something you said that shocked me a little. Although you probably don't take it so seriously, you have a role of high responsibility. Previously it had been handed to you on a plate a bit, so you may not understand all that needs to be arranged, but really - as amusing as it is for the first minute, it becomes cheek-reddening. That it's repeatedly become a problem suggests you should look into it, no? And I don't think you recognise the humiliation we'd have to live through with its immediate impact, before the shouting we'll have to endure.
....and not cool.
Although you may enjoy passing judgement on people so frequently and harshly, you may want to consider your own position first, so that 'retaliation' cannot be used as the way to describe to later actions... didn't think this one through, did you?









*like*
ReplyDelete*like*
*like*